Skip to main content

Research

Research

Where we are headed — not something we have done

A model that rolls a whole reactor forward

Today we teach a model one flow, one geometry at a time. What we actually want is a model that has learned how a reactor behaves as a whole, one you can hand a changed condition and let it roll forward on its own. A world model, in other words.

ModelChanged conditionCurrent stateNext stateWhat it produces becomes the next input
What we have
We generate training data from high-fidelity simulation, compress the flow into a few dozen representative shapes, and have a network carry it forward one step at a time. For cross flow between steam generator tubes, a 33-hour computation came down to 35.5 seconds. We have also trained with physics as a constraint, and recovered three-dimensional shapes from two images.
What is missing
A model of that kind is right only inside the geometry and the conditions it was trained on. Change the tube pitch or raise the power and it has to learn again from scratch. People do not work that way: once the feel is there, a layout you have never seen is still readable. Giving a machine that feel is what remains.
Why it is worth wanting
Design is, in the end, asking “what if we change this” a few thousand times. When one such question costs a day, the number of questions is what limits you. Make the rolling-forward cheap and the limit becomes the quality of the questions instead. Playing an accident sequence forward before it happens is the same problem.

There is a long way to go. The reduced-order models and physics-constrained learning we are building now are the footing for it.

See machine learning for thermal-hydraulics